RKLBRocket Lab+Neutron.DevLUNRIntuitive+IM-2.LandingASTSAST Space+BlueBird.DeployPLPlanet Labs+Pelican.LaunchBKSYBlackSky+Gen-3.LiveSPIRSpire+100.SatsRDWRedwire+ISM.ModuleIRDMIridium+IoT.ExpandVSATViasat+ViaSat-3.LiveSPACEXSpaceX+Starship.V3FUND.YTD2025-26$12B+.Raised

Research Hub

Key papers and studies shaping the space economy -- launch vehicles, propulsion, satellite communications, earth observation, manufacturing, defense, and orbital services.

10 papers tracked. Updated Q1 2026.

Launch VehiclesMar 12, 2026

Starship Super Heavy Booster Recovery: Mechanical Capture vs Propulsive Landing

SpaceX Engineering, Zach Putnam, Lars Blackmore // SpaceX

Comparative analysis of the mechanical "chopstick" capture system used on Super Heavy boosters versus traditional propulsive landing on droneships. Data from 14 consecutive successful catches demonstrates 99.2% structural reuse after catch with zero refurbishment turnaround, compared to 3-5 day pad inspections for propulsive landings. The paper models capture dynamics, load distribution through the tower arms, and vehicle stress profiles during deceleration.

Key Finding:Mechanical capture reduces booster turnaround to under 60 minutes and eliminates landing leg mass penalty, enabling the 1-hour reflights that underpin Starship economics.
Read paper →
Satellite CommsFeb 20, 2026

Direct-to-Device Satellite Architecture: AST SpaceMobile BlueBird vs Starlink DTC

Abel Avellan, Jonathan Hofeller, Mia Chen // IEEE

Head-to-head technical comparison of the two leading direct-to-device satellite architectures: AST SpaceMobile's large-aperture BlueBird constellation (64 m^2 phased arrays, 5G NR) and SpaceX's Starlink DTC approach (compact satellites, high count, LTE fallback). Field tests across 12 countries show BlueBird achieving 14 Mbps down / 5 Mbps up on unmodified handsets, while Starlink DTC delivers 2-4 Mbps with 10x more satellites but lower per-unit cost.

Key Finding:Neither architecture dominates: BlueBird wins on per-user throughput, Starlink DTC wins on coverage economics. Carrier partnerships and spectrum allocation will determine market outcome.
Read paper →
Space StationsJan 28, 2026

Commercial Space Station Structural Design: Single-Launch vs Modular Assembly

Michael Suffredini, Jeffrey Manber, Brent Sherwood // AIAA

Engineering trade study comparing single-launch monolithic stations (enabled by Starship's 9m fairing) against traditional modular assembly used by Axiom, Vast, and Orbital Reef. Structural analysis shows single-launch designs achieve 2.3x pressurized volume per kg launched while eliminating berthing port failure modes. The paper models crew capacity, microgravity quality, and orbital lifetime for both approaches.

Key Finding:Single-launch stations enabled by super-heavy lift cut construction risk by 80% and reduce total program cost by 40% compared to modular assembly, fundamentally reshaping the commercial station market.
Read paper →
PropulsionMar 5, 2026

Solar Thermal Propulsion for Rapid Orbital Maneuvering

Jeff Sheehy, Ian Walters, Portal Space Systems Engineering // Portal Space / AIAA

Presents flight demonstration results from Portal Space's Supernova solar thermal engine, achieving 700s specific impulse using concentrated solar energy to heat hydrogen propellant. The system delivers 3x the delta-v of electric propulsion at 10x the thrust, enabling rapid orbit transfers that close the gap between chemical and electric systems. Mission analysis covers LEO-to-GEO transfer, constellation phasing, and responsive space applications.

Key Finding:Solar thermal propulsion fills the thrust-efficiency gap between chemical and electric, enabling 48-hour LEO-to-GEO transfers versus 6 months for electric -- critical for defense responsive space.
Read paper →
In-Space ManufacturingFeb 14, 2026

Pharmaceutical Crystal Growth in Microgravity: Varda W-2 Mission Results

Delian Asparouhov, Will Bruey, Adrian Radocea et al. // Nature

Reports results from Varda Space Industries' second orbital manufacturing mission (W-2), demonstrating commercial-scale microgravity crystallization of two pharmaceutical compounds. The ritonavir polymorph produced in LEO showed 3.2x bioavailability improvement over ground-based equivalents, while a novel cancer therapeutic crystal form was achieved that is thermodynamically inaccessible at 1g. Cost-per-dose analysis shows space manufacturing becomes economical for high-value compounds above $50,000/kg.

Key Finding:W-2 demonstrates that microgravity crystallization is not just superior but can produce crystal polymorphs physically impossible on Earth, opening a new category of space-enabled therapeutics.
Read paper →
DefenseJan 15, 2026

Proliferated LEO for National Defense: SDA Tranche 2 Architecture Analysis

Derek Tournear, RAND National Security Research Division // RAND

Independent assessment of the Space Development Agency's Tranche 2 Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture, analyzing the 250+ satellite constellation for missile tracking, transport, and custody transfer. The study evaluates detection-to-engagement timelines, mesh network resilience under adversarial jamming, and cost comparisons to legacy GEO-based architectures. Wargame simulations show the proliferated LEO approach maintains 94% mission capability after loss of 30% of constellation.

Key Finding:Proliferated LEO constellations provide 7x faster missile tracking handoff and survive contested environments far better than legacy GEO systems, but ground segment integration remains the critical bottleneck.
Read paper →
Debris RemovalMar 22, 2026

Active Debris Removal Economics: Cost-Benefit of ELSA-M vs ClearSpace-1

Holger Krag, Tim Maclay, Astroscale Engineering et al. // ESA

Comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of the two leading active debris removal approaches: Astroscale's ELSA-M multi-target servicer (magnetic capture, 5 removals per mission) and ClearSpace-1's single-target capture-and-deorbit vehicle. Models collision probability cascades under various removal scenarios and calculates the insurance premium reduction per object removed. ELSA-M achieves $12M per removal at scale versus $90M for ClearSpace-1, but ClearSpace handles larger, higher-priority debris.

Key Finding:Removing just 5 high-priority objects per year reduces catastrophic collision probability by 30% over a decade, and the economics become self-sustaining once orbital insurance mandates debris removal bonds.
Read paper →
PropulsionApr 1, 2026

Reusable Methalox Engine Design: Raptor 3 vs BE-4 vs Miranda Performance Comparison

Thomas Mueller, Andrew Feldman, Stoke Space Engineering // AIAA

First public performance comparison of three operational methalox engines: SpaceX Raptor 3 (full-flow staged combustion, 280 tf), Blue Origin BE-4 (oxygen-rich staged combustion, 250 tf), and Stoke Space Miranda (full-flow, 45 tf, designed for 100+ reuses). Analysis covers chamber pressure, specific impulse, thrust-to-weight ratio, and demonstrated reuse cycles. Raptor 3 leads on chamber pressure (350 bar) and TWR, BE-4 on accumulated flight hours, and Miranda on designed reuse lifetime.

Key Finding:Methalox full-flow staged combustion has proven itself as the dominant architecture for reusable engines, with Raptor 3 achieving 350 bar chamber pressure -- approaching theoretical limits for the cycle.
Read paper →
LunarFeb 28, 2026

Lunar ISRU Water Extraction: Polar Crater Thermal Mining Feasibility

Philip Metzger, George Sowers, NASA Kennedy Space Center // NASA

Updated feasibility study for thermal mining of water ice in permanently shadowed lunar craters, incorporating VIPER rover data and Lunar Trailblazer spectral measurements. The study models three extraction approaches: direct sublimation tents, auger-drill-and-heat, and microwave heating. Energy budgets, equipment mass, and production rates are calculated for a 1,000 kg/year water plant. Thermal mining with concentrated solar (via relay mirrors above crater rims) emerges as the most mass-efficient approach at 15 kg water per kg of equipment per year.

Key Finding:Concentrated solar thermal mining can produce lunar propellant at $500/kg delivered to low lunar orbit -- 50x cheaper than Earth-launched propellant, making cislunar infrastructure economically viable.
Read paper →
Earth ObservationMar 18, 2026

SAR Constellation Optimization: ICEYE vs Capella vs Umbra Revisit Analysis

Rafal Modrzewski, Payam Banazadeh, David Langan // IEEE

Quantitative comparison of three commercial SAR constellations analyzing revisit rate, resolution, coherence for interferometry, and tip-and-cue response time. ICEYE's 36-satellite constellation achieves sub-1-hour average revisit at 25cm resolution, Capella delivers 15cm spotlight mode with 2-hour revisit from 12 satellites, and Umbra offers 16cm resolution with unique look-angle diversity. The study models optimal constellation sizing for maritime domain awareness, infrastructure monitoring, and intelligence applications.

Key Finding:Commercial SAR constellations now match or exceed national technical means for non-classified applications, with combined multi-provider tasking achieving 15-minute average revisit over any point on Earth.
Read paper →